HomeTexasCulturePoll: More gun restrictions, but no trust in government to do them...

Poll: More gun restrictions, but no trust in government to do them right

Published on


A new poll shows that many favor increased gun restrictions, but they also don’t trust the government.  Somewhere between universal background checks and “ban semi automatic rifles” lies a way forward, and an independent Texas can bridge the gap. 

The video linked here reports the results of the poll put out by NPR and Ipsos.  Put on your bias filters, because NPR leans left.  

Several interesting results come out of this poll.  First, a majority of “Americans” favor “common sense” gun control measures.  Now we all know that on average Texans aren’t all “American” when it comes to gun stuff.  I may not be entirely typical, I’m a Texan who got my first 22 in elementary school, a shotgun before I could drive, and a deer rifle for high school graduation. I bought my son an AR-15 for his high school graduation, because he already had a 22, shotgun, and deer rifle. Even with all that, I support universal background checks as “common sense.”  I clearly don’t support the idea of increasing the purchasing age, and I seriously doubt that any version of “American” “common sense” is right for Texas.

The poll also found that only 25% of respondents trust the government to implement new restrictions properly.  Once again, if only 25% of “Americans” trust the government, what do you think the number is in Texas?  It has to be lower.  I find myself squarely in the no-trust group.  After all, it was the US military that failed to report a disqualifying conviction that led to the Sutherland Springs, TX shooter being able to pass a background check.  If the government can’t report its own data to itself or can’t follow its own rules, why should we trust them to make new rules for us?  

But won’t a “universal background check” amount to gun registration?  That fear is common among those of us who don’t trust the federal government, but there’s no reason why the two must be connected.  All that’s required to keep guns out of the hands of criminals is a yes/no database of eligibility status.  There’s no logical requirement that there be a serial number, gun type, or any other information attached to the query. The current Federal background check system DOES require an associated serial number and DOES amount to registration.  Any expansion of the current system IS basically universal registration. Can you see why we’re suspicious?  

One distinct advantage Texas would have in an independent scenario is to build a data system from scratch.  It’s my hope that Texas could in fact build a better background check system, with a good balance between freedom and responsibility.  If I can walk up to any gas pump in the nation and they can tell how much money I have in my bank account and take out an appropriate amount, there’s no reason in the world that I shouldn’t be able to log on the internet, put in a potential buyer’s information, such as name, date of birth, and drivers license number, and instantly get back a yes/no result on a background check.  Do I trust the federal government to build a comprehensive system with a user-friendly interface?  Not a chance, they’re too incompetent.  They’d build a lousy database and then make it impossible for regular folks to use.  

Another advantage of an independent Texas is the opportunity to revisit some gun laws that make no sense.  After all, to the federal government a rifle with a 16.01” barrel is fine, but a rifle with a 15.99” barrel is illegal, unless it’s a pistol. Confused yet?  To these same folks, a device whose sole purpose is to protect my ears is instead branded as a “silencer” used by TV spies with inaccurate sound effects.  In another fun twist, an 18 year old may purchase 22LR or 9mm ammo to shoot out of a rifle, but must wait till age 21 to buy the same ammo for a pistol.  The federal system makes no sense! Any of these issues could be fixed without much controversy in a free Texas.

An independent Texas will immediately be free from some of the US’ gun dysfunction, but we need not be the “wild west” either. Perhaps we’d even attract a good group of gun manufacturers willing to play by our less complicated rules. I am excited to see what we come up with, because I sure don’t trust the federal government to do anything functional any time soon when it comes to gun restrictions.

Discussion is locked

Login to leave a comment

Latest articles

TNM Unveils Reorganization of Local Groups to Drive TEXIT Forward

The Texas Nationalist Movement is excited to announce a significant reorganization of our local...

Texas GOP Adopts TNM-Led Measure to Ban Out-of-State Campaign Contributions

Texas GOP Secures Election Integrity by Banning Out-of-State ContributionsIn another win for the Texas...

Historians Are the Last People to Ask About The Future of Texas

In the debate over Texas independence, many voices clamor for attention. Politicians, economists, activists,...

Texas Secessionists Win GOP Backing for Independence Vote: ‘Major Step’ | Newsweek

The Republican Party of Texas is calling for a referendum on whether the state "should reassert its status as an independent nation" as a "legislative priority" in the next session of the Texas legislature.

More like this

Revealed: Over $12 Billion in Foreign Funding Flows to U.S. Universities, Threatening Texan Sovereignty and Educational Integrity

The integrity of higher education in the United States is under threat, betrayed by...

Sam Houston’s Legacy and the Modern Call for TEXIT

Today marks the anniversary of Sam Houston being sworn in as the first President...

Moses Rose’s Hideout vs. the City of San Antonio

In a modern day south Texas showdown, Moses Rose’s Hideout, a San Antonio bar...
Send this to a friend