In a move that reflects growing concerns over the integrity of the 2024 presidential election, a group of West Virginia legislators has introduced House Concurrent Resolution 203. This resolution, brought forward by Republican delegates, makes it clear that West Virginia will not recognize any presidential election that it deems compromised. While the resolution specifically focuses on election security and federal oversight, its broader implications suggest that a shift toward state independence may be on the horizon.
A Call for Action
The resolution highlights key concerns, including two assassination attempts on the Republican presidential nominee, Donald Trump. The document states that if further interference, whether through violence or legal manipulation, impacts the Republican candidate’s ability to run for office, West Virginia will refuse to recognize the election results. This action sends a clear signal: the state is prepared to defend its electoral process and its role in protecting the will of its people.

West Virginia’s introduction of this resolution reflects a growing national trend where states are reevaluating their relationship with the federal government. Across the country, there is a rising sentiment that Washington has failed to protect the interests of individual states. For many, this resolution is more than just a response to electoral concerns—it is a declaration of the state’s right to assert its independence when federal actions fail to protect its citizens.
A Domino Effect
West Virginia’s Resolution 203 is an important moment in modern political history, one that could pave the way for further actions by other states. When a state like West Virginia, with its strong unionist background, takes a stand against federal authority, it signals a deeper shift in American politics. The resolution is not merely about contesting election results but represents a broader demand for states to have control over their own affairs.
“West Virginia’s introduction of House Concurrent Resolution 203 shows that they, like many others, are beginning to question the relationship between the states and the federal government. As we’ve seen with the TEXIT movement, this isn’t just about politics. It’s about states recognizing that they have the right to control their own destiny. West Virginia’s resolution is a clear signal that the idea of self-determination is gaining traction, and it mirrors the same drive we’ve been pushing for in Texas,” said Daniel Miller, President of the Texas Nationalist Movement.
This resolution could serve as the first domino in a series of events that lead other states to question their role within the Union. States like Texas, which have a long history of advocating for independence, are watching closely. When one state begins to assert its right to govern itself without interference from Washington, it sets a precedent for others to follow. West Virginia’s actions may well inspire states to take more assertive steps toward self-governance and independence.
A Path Toward Independence
The introduction of House Resolution 203 is not just about election integrity—it is a declaration of intent by West Virginia to control its own future. The document outlines specific scenarios in which West Virginia would invalidate the results of the 2024 election. These include situations where the Republican candidates are injured, assassinated, or legally barred from appearing on the ballot. These concerns are symptomatic of deeper issues with how the federal government interacts with the states.
West Virginia’s willingness to challenge federal authority opens the door for other states to take similar actions. This resolution shows how quickly the conversation can shift from policy disagreements to the broader issue of independence. In a climate where states feel increasingly disconnected from federal leadership, resolutions like HCR 203 lay the groundwork for future independence movements. West Virginia’s actions show that states are prepared to defend their autonomy when they believe that federal overreach has undermined their democratic processes.
Independence Movements Gaining Momentum
Across the United States, movements advocating for independence are gaining momentum. West Virginia’s resolution is a prime example of how a state can begin the process of reclaiming its rights. For Texas, the implications are clear. Texas has long been at the forefront of the independence conversation, and resolutions like this one in West Virginia are a reminder that states have the power to take control of their own destiny. This isn’t just about a single election. It’s about a broader awakening to the need for states to regain their independence.
West Virginia has taken a decisive step in the direction of asserting its own authority. This could be the spark that ignites similar actions across the country. With each state that begins to question its relationship with the federal government, the path to independence becomes clearer. What starts as a call for election integrity can quickly evolve into a movement for self-determination.
The Next Domino
The introduction of House Concurrent Resolution 203 in West Virginia is more than just political posturing. It could be the first domino in a series of events that lead states to withdraw from the Union. This is how independence movements take root—not with grand declarations but with focused, deliberate actions that challenge federal overreach. As more states follow West Virginia’s lead, the potential for more states to join Texas on the path to independence increases exponentially.
What we are witnessing is the beginning of a broader movement. Independence for states like Texas and others is not a distant idea—it’s happening now. West Virginia’s resolution is proof that states are ready to assert their rights and reclaim their future. As the first domino falls, the conversation shifts from if independence will happen to when. And for Texans, it’s already happening.
Login to leave a comment